Skip to content

python-patterns

Python development principles and decision-making for 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize patterns.


This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.

  • ASK user for framework preference when unclear
  • Choose async vs sync based on CONTEXT
  • Don’t default to same framework every time

What are you building?
├── API-first / Microservices
│ └── FastAPI (async, modern, fast)
├── Full-stack web / CMS / Admin
│ └── Django (batteries-included)
├── Simple / Script / Learning
│ └── Flask (minimal, flexible)
├── AI/ML API serving
│ └── FastAPI (Pydantic, async, uvicorn)
└── Background workers
└── Celery + any framework
FactorFastAPIDjangoFlask
Best forAPIs, microservicesFull-stack, CMSSimple, learning
AsyncNativeDjango 5.0+Via extensions
AdminManualBuilt-inVia extensions
ORMChoose your ownDjango ORMChoose your own
Learning curveLowMediumLow
  1. Is this API-only or full-stack?
  2. Need admin interface?
  3. Team familiar with async?
  4. Existing infrastructure?

async def is better when:
├── I/O-bound operations (database, HTTP, file)
├── Many concurrent connections
├── Real-time features
├── Microservices communication
└── FastAPI/Starlette/Django ASGI
def (sync) is better when:
├── CPU-bound operations
├── Simple scripts
├── Legacy codebase
├── Team unfamiliar with async
└── Blocking libraries (no async version)
I/O-bound → async (waiting for external)
CPU-bound → sync + multiprocessing (computing)
Don't:
├── Mix sync and async carelessly
├── Use sync libraries in async code
└── Force async for CPU work
NeedAsync Library
HTTP clienthttpx
PostgreSQLasyncpg
Redisaioredis / redis-py async
File I/Oaiofiles
Database ORMSQLAlchemy 2.0 async, Tortoise

Always type:
├── Function parameters
├── Return types
├── Class attributes
├── Public APIs
Can skip:
├── Local variables (let inference work)
├── One-off scripts
├── Tests (usually)
# These are patterns, understand them:
# Optional → might be None
from typing import Optional
def find_user(id: int) -> Optional[User]: ...
# Union → one of multiple types
def process(data: str | dict) -> None: ...
# Generic collections
def get_items() -> list[Item]: ...
def get_mapping() -> dict[str, int]: ...
# Callable
from typing import Callable
def apply(fn: Callable[[int], str]) -> str: ...
When to use Pydantic:
├── API request/response models
├── Configuration/settings
├── Data validation
├── Serialization
Benefits:
├── Runtime validation
├── Auto-generated JSON schema
├── Works with FastAPI natively
└── Clear error messages

Small project / Script:
├── main.py
├── utils.py
└── requirements.txt
Medium API:
├── app/
│ ├── __init__.py
│ ├── main.py
│ ├── models/
│ ├── routes/
│ ├── services/
│ └── schemas/
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml
Large application:
├── src/
│ └── myapp/
│ ├── core/
│ ├── api/
│ ├── services/
│ ├── models/
│ └── ...
├── tests/
└── pyproject.toml
Organize by feature or layer:
By layer:
├── routes/ (API endpoints)
├── services/ (business logic)
├── models/ (database models)
├── schemas/ (Pydantic models)
└── dependencies/ (shared deps)
By feature:
├── users/
│ ├── routes.py
│ ├── service.py
│ └── schemas.py
└── products/
└── ...

Django supports async:
├── Async views
├── Async middleware
├── Async ORM (limited)
└── ASGI deployment
When to use async in Django:
├── External API calls
├── WebSocket (Channels)
├── High-concurrency views
└── Background task triggering
Model design:
├── Fat models, thin views
├── Use managers for common queries
├── Abstract base classes for shared fields
Views:
├── Class-based for complex CRUD
├── Function-based for simple endpoints
├── Use viewsets with DRF
Queries:
├── select_related() for FKs
├── prefetch_related() for M2M
├── Avoid N+1 queries
└── Use .only() for specific fields

Use async def when:
├── Using async database drivers
├── Making async HTTP calls
├── I/O-bound operations
└── Want to handle concurrency
Use def when:
├── Blocking operations
├── Sync database drivers
├── CPU-bound work
└── FastAPI runs in threadpool automatically
Use dependencies for:
├── Database sessions
├── Current user / Auth
├── Configuration
├── Shared resources
Benefits:
├── Testability (mock dependencies)
├── Clean separation
├── Automatic cleanup (yield)
# FastAPI + Pydantic are tightly integrated:
# Request validation
@app.post("/users")
async def create(user: UserCreate) -> UserResponse:
# user is already validated
...
# Response serialization
# Return type becomes response schema

SolutionBest For
BackgroundTasksSimple, in-process tasks
CeleryDistributed, complex workflows
ARQAsync, Redis-based
RQSimple Redis queue
DramatiqActor-based, simpler than Celery
FastAPI BackgroundTasks:
├── Quick operations
├── No persistence needed
├── Fire-and-forget
└── Same process
Celery/ARQ:
├── Long-running tasks
├── Need retry logic
├── Distributed workers
├── Persistent queue
└── Complex workflows

In FastAPI:
├── Create custom exception classes
├── Register exception handlers
├── Return consistent error format
└── Log without exposing internals
Pattern:
├── Raise domain exceptions in services
├── Catch and transform in handlers
└── Client gets clean error response
Include:
├── Error code (programmatic)
├── Message (human readable)
├── Details (field-level when applicable)
└── NOT stack traces (security)

TypePurposeTools
UnitBusiness logicpytest
IntegrationAPI endpointspytest + httpx/TestClient
E2EFull workflowspytest + DB
# Use pytest-asyncio for async tests
import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_endpoint():
async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client:
response = await client.get("/users")
assert response.status_code == 200
Common fixtures:
├── db_session → Database connection
├── client → Test client
├── authenticated_user → User with token
└── sample_data → Test data setup

Before implementing:

  • Asked user about framework preference?
  • Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
  • Decided async vs sync?
  • Planned type hint strategy?
  • Defined project structure?
  • Planned error handling?
  • Considered background tasks?

  • Default to Django for simple APIs (FastAPI may be better)
  • Use sync libraries in async code
  • Skip type hints for public APIs
  • Put business logic in routes/views
  • Ignore N+1 queries
  • Mix async and sync carelessly
  • Choose framework based on context
  • Ask about async requirements
  • Use Pydantic for validation
  • Separate concerns (routes → services → repos)
  • Test critical paths

Remember: Python patterns are about decision-making for YOUR specific context. Don’t copy code—think about what serves your application best.

Always identify gaps and suggest next steps to users. In case there is no gaps anymore, then AI should clearly state that there is no gap left.